Package: trn4 Version: 4.0-test77-5 Followup-For: Bug #682803 I should have investigated the article reported in the backtrace. It has a References header of 1034 characters, and we are trying (at artsrch.c line 400) to sprintf that into good old 'buf' which is only 1024 bytes long.
I fear this may not be generally soluble without changing some of trn's basic assumptions, such as all headers it may receive being less than a certain fixed length. This is not true under RFC5536, even if it ever was under RFC1036. On the other hand, doubling up the buffer lengths might see us die hard trn lovers through another 25 years of Usenet, perhaps ? It's not as if RAM size is a problem on most platforms these days. Nick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
