Package: dh-make Version: 0.60 Severity: important lib/licenses/mit (or lib/licenses/x11 in the previous version) has the software under the MIT license, and the packaging under GPL2+. That seems 1) bad, and 2) inconsistent with the advice in the same file that goes on to say "Please avoid to pick license terms that are more restrictive than the packaged work".
Cheers, Julien -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
