Hi Dominique On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:53:24AM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > Le Wednesday 25 July 2012 08:59:14, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : > > libclass-isa-perl | perl (<< 5.10.1-13) > > > > get's reduced to perl. But libclass-isa-perl is not real-dual lived > > module: > > [...] > > > Previously Class::ISA was in Perl core: > > > > Class::ISA was first released with perl v5.7.3 and removed from v5.13.1 > > > > In unstable, only libclass-isa-perl has furthermore Class/ISA.pm. > > Ack. > > > I'm considering either: > - leave dependencies with '<<' or '<=' as is > - handle module that are removed from corelist and suggest a correct > dependency field. > > Since the latter is not that obvious, I just wonder if the effort is worth > the > trouble ...
Yes agree the latter is furthermore maybe too seldom to try to implement such a check. I would say let's go for the first one if feasible. Regards, Salvatore
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
