Hi Konstantin.

On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 16:00 +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> Uh, sorry but I'm now somewhat lost now.
Sorry ;)



> First, we don't have a bug in our BTS about this upstream issue, so
> definitely uploading of 2.1.10-3 wasn't supposed to fix it (as I did
> not even know this issue exists).
Yeah of course,... I just think parts of it are similar (s2s
problems)... so anyone who faces the problems I have, and who read about
the this Debian bug, can see that there are still things wrong, which
may, though similar, be unrelated to this issue :)



> Second, the bug is still open, so upstream's 2.1.11 (which we
> failed to push into Debian in time before the freeze) wasn't expected to
> fix it either.
Yes, I guess so.


> Third, the s2s issue has (supposedly) nothing to do with clustered
> setup: s2s is about different XMPP servers (I mean, controlled by
> different authorities) speak (XMPP) to each other to allow their users
> communicate.
Of course,...
It's just one effect that I have,.. that s2s (controlled by different
authorities) become completely broken.... and I get these
"temporarily_blocked" thingy...



> Now that I have shed some light onto this issue (I hope), I have the
> next question: do you observe any crash reports, like the one cited
> above, in your logs?
I grepped through my logs for "undef", but there were no occurances...
So I guess that issue is solved.

I you need, I can send you my logs,... I guess they contain no
confidential infos (apart from the JIDs perhaps).


> 1) You seem to be affected by that EJAB-1565 issue; if so, please file
>    a bug in the Debian BTS against 2.1.10 with the "upstream" tag, so
>    we know the issue exists that affects at least one of our users.
#685606.


> 2) We have 2.1.11 package ready and could possibly upload it into
>    experimental if you feel like experimenting with it and seeing if it
>    can resolve some of your problems.  So if you feel like such an
>    upload could be handy, let us know.
I guess that may make sense... although I feel that at least some of the
problems I describe there are deeper problems and not simple bugs.
Especially that the nodes apparently never try to reconnect to each
other, once the connection got lost.

Have you already had a look at 3.x versions?


Cheers,
Chris.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to