Hi Keith, Thanks for the prompt response.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:09:09PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Serafeim Zanikolas <s...@debian.org> wrote: > > Since I haven't heard from you on a fix for 1.6, 1.5 tests never ran > > successfully, and I do not wish to keep 1.4 in the next Debian stable > > release, > > I'm going to request the removal of beanstalkd from the Debian archive. > > > > Even if you were to prepare a fix now, I'm not sure that the release team > > would accept a new upstream version. > > That's too bad. Is there a compelling reason why 1.4 isn't suitable? I'm happy to keep 1.4 if you as upstream commit to support it for serious bug and security issues for another 3+ years. As an aside, I'm not actually using beanstalkd (the reason I've packaged it is not there any more) but I'm OK doing the packaging given a responsive upstream. -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
