* Willi Mann wrote [17.06.12 12:34]: Any progress on this? This should be a rather simple issue.
> My recommendation is to rename the binary of dconf. Maybe the binaries > name could be changed to confdumper? I think this would be a great proposal but from the Debian Policy: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html ,---- | Two different packages must not install programs with different functionality | but with the same filenames. (The case of two programs having the same | functionality but different implementations is handled via "alternatives" or | the "Conflicts" mechanism. See Maintainer Scripts, Section 3.9 and Conflicting | binary packages - Conflicts, Section 7.4 respectively.) If this case happens, | one of the programs must be renamed. The maintainers should report this to the | debian-devel mailing list and try to find a consensus about which program will | have to be renamed. If a consensus cannot be reached, both programs must be | renamed. `---- I am not sure what happens when the maintainer does not react but maybe the package should get removed > Greetings from Salzburg BSP Greetings from the Dublin BSP Ulrich
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
