On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:57:20 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > In my understanding, libio-socket-ip-perl is newer, preferred by > > upstream, and supports both IPv4 and IPv6. So the Recommends makes > > more sense to me than the B-D-I. > Yes upstream has the following order in IO:Socket::SSL: > ----cut---------cut---------cut---------cut---------cut---------cut----- > 80 # try IO::Socket::IP or IO::Socket::INET6 for IPv6 support
> So it first checks for IO::Socket::IP and then vor IO::socket::INET6 > if the first one does not succeed. I would thus think it's correct to > leave libio-socket-ip-perl (>= 0.11) | libio-socket-inet6-perl. Ack, that was my conclusion too. > > Salvatore, do you still remember the reason for c622141? > > Ah, I think libio-socket-ip-perl was too old (i.e. 0.11 not yet > > uploaded) at the time of the change? > I'm not anymore 100% sure, but yes I think you are correct. Ok :) > At first glance it seems okay for me to now also change the > Build-Depends-Indep ordering. I think so, too. Thanks! Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Pogues: Boys From The County Hell
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature