Ok, well I am sorry if I bothered you. I honestly didn't come here tostart a fight and maybe should have been more clear. I also agree that if he is willing to change the license that makes for an easy solution.
But to answer your question as to why I think it is not dfsg free it is in the debian-legal response I got from Francesco Poli[1]. He clearly states that it is not DFSG free for the following reasons: "I think the above-quoted license is extremely vague and ambiguous. It's not at all clear what the term "use" is supposed to cover. Is copying allowed? Modifying? Redistributing (gratis or in exchange of a fee)? Distributing modified copies? None of these activities is explicitly permitted. As a consequence, this license does not (clearly) meet the DFSG." [1]http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/09/msg00018.html -- *Grant H. *Email: sirgr...@member.fsf.org *Ask me for my GPG key *I'm an FSF member -- Help us support software freedom! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
