On 2012-09-20 07:30, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Andreas Beckmann (deb...@abeckmann.de): >> Please unblock package fglrx-driver > > I very strongly object to this.
> I appreciate the effort you have put up to now in maintaining this > package in an l10n-friendly way so I think we can easily reach an agreement. > > I can for instance make sure you get these 8 needed updates (among > others probably). I can even "shake" the late comers (there will be some). That would be great. Let's see how the situation looks on October 1st. > Many thanks in advance for considering my objection, still..:-) >From my experience, it takes time to get non-translation updates approved, therefore I wanted to send the unblock request as early as possible so that the changes can be reviewed while I'm waiting for translations to come in. Translation-only updates seem to get accepted quickly (cf. nvidia-support, nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx). And I want to get this update in wheezy quickly to avoid collecting a lot of duplicates of the "on amd64, wine 32bit opengl does not work any more" bug (due to having the old monolithic ia32-libs installed). Furthermore it contains wrong or missing information - that was not yet available during the previous translation round. So while I appreciate your i18n efforts (and try to make my packages translation friendly), I think it would be better to temporarily have a partially translated fglrx-driver package in wheezy. And we are talking about non-free here. So hopefully once the package migrates, I can make another i18n upload with all the translations (that could even be aged to get in more quickly). Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org