On Thursday 20 September 2012 05:36:56 Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that clear for me, "phonon-backend-null | phonon" is odd and it > should be "phonon-backend-null | phonon-backend" since phonon-backend-null > provides phonon-backend virtual package and pulls phonon package causes > just a confuse. > > I'll upload package include this change with 10days/delayed (safe side). > If you want to cancel it, please tell me.
please cancel it. The dependency on phonon *is* correct. Either you want phonon-backend-null *or* a working phonon. Phonon is the package to depend on to get a working phonon. if you want a working phonon, you must depend on phonon. The bug is not in the phonon package. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
