* Aaron M. Ucko <[email protected]> wrote: > 3 would have been in lieu of 2, which is in retrospect a better choice in this > case, and will give you the opportunity to tighten liblttng-ctl0's own shlibs > while you're at it. Please take care to have ltt-control build-depend on > a version of liburcu-dev with this fix. (I presume liburcu-dev already > Depends: liburcu1 (= ${binary:Version}.)
Ahh, good advice. Thanks. -- Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
