severity 687931 important thanks On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:13:22AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: >> Looking at the error, it's not a segfault, whouldn't lead to a security >> issue. It's "just" unsupported functionality, even if it doesn't error >> out gracefully. >> >> So does it really justify RC status? Don't get me wrong: I don't want to >> hide issues, and we probably need to replace the abort() case with sth. >> more useable. Just don't have a fast solution for today. > Sounds like important to me, but I'm not very experienced.
Until the bug can be reproduced using more 'widespread' J2K file, I guess we can downgrade to important. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
