On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:29:17AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 12:34 PM +0100 Jose Manuel dos
> Santos Calhariz <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >>
> >>What version of BDB are you linked to?
> >
> >We follow Debian on this.  Openldap 2.4.31 is linked to BDB 5.1.29 and
> >openldap 2.4.23 is linked to BDB 4.8.30.
> >
> >
> >
> >In attach there is a "db5.1_stat -CA" from one server with problems,
> >openldap 2.4.31.
> 
> But now you changed two things -- BDB and OpenLDAP.
> 
> You may also want to look at
> <http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/?findid=7222>, fixed in
> OpenLDAP 2.4.32.
> 
> Personally, I've dumped BDB entirely, and now use current RE24
> OpenLDAP from git with OpenLDAP's MDB, which is faster than BDB in
> all areas, and doesn't have the locking issues that come with BDB.
> 
> <http://highlandsun.com/hyc/mdb/>

Thank you for your suggestions.  For now we will try to make work the
the versions of slapd and BDB for the next Debian release, slapd 2.4.31 and
BDB 5.1.29.  

> 
> --Quanah
> 
> 

     Jose Calhariz

-- 
--

Há pessoas tão chatas que nos fazem perder um dia em 5 minutos

--Jules Renard

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to