On 2012-10-03 17:19, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Oct 2012, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> seems to work, also if the conffile gets replaced by an updated version
>> on the way, but it leaves an old md5sum entry in the Conffiles entry of
>> old-pkg in the status file.
>>
>> This causes subsequent debsums runs to report modified files (for a
>> package which no longer owns the file).
> 
> That entry in Conffiles is marked "obsolete" and as you point out,
> the package is no longer owning the conffile (i.e. the file is no longer
> listed in the output of dpkg -L).
> 
> I believe that debsums should just ignore those entries.

FTR, debsums should not ignore *all* "obsolete" Conffiles entries (that
would be trivial), but only those for files not longer "owned" by the
package in question.

I tried to look into debsums, but that seems to be a non-trivial change,
as currently "dpkg -L" (or some equivalent) is a concept not used in
debsums (it gets file lists from *.md5sums and Conffiles: fields).


Andreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to