On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 03:17:17PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 05.10.2012 15:06, schrieb Khaled Hosny: > >But that is not what the previous discussions suggest, nor the current > >practice; almost all font names are unique, yet many packages includes a > >foundry name or even invent one if it does not exist e.g. > >fonts-hosny-amiri and fonts-hosny-thabit; there is no other fonts with > >the names Amiri or Thabit nor there is a foundry named Hosny. > > Hm, but then we are inconsistent. For example, we have > fonts-freefont-{ttf,otf}, although the upstream project is > explicitely named "GNU FreeFont". :/
Right, and I checked other fonts-* package and there is indeed large inconsistency and I can’t tell what is the rule for including or omitting foundry name, it seems random. Regards, Khaled -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org