Am 08.10.2012 02:47, schrieb Norbert Preining:
Ah, now I remember the old story ... thanks for digging out that.
Yes, there are problems with that, and AFAIR they have never been resolved.
So I guess the best is to either convince gs people to use proper
handling of font names, or to keep the fonts separate.
According to [1], ghostscript is currently shipping the pristine set
of fonts that they received directly from URW++ in early 2011. They
are, however, different (in md5sums) to the ones provided on CTAN.
- Fabian
[1] http://ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-devel/2012-October/009305.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
