Control: severity -1 grave
Dear Michael,
Am Mittwoch, den 03.10.2012, 11:44 +0200 schrieb Thomas Schmitt:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Gilbert wrote:
Michael, please CC bug submitter and try to keep threading! Thomas,
thanks for the reply and CCing me.
> > It seems like the wrong fs type was used.
>
> Could you elaborate your theory ?
I guess, Michael means when executing `mount`. This is from my original
report.
$ sudo mount -t iso9660 /dev/sr1 /mnt/
mount: block device /dev/sr1 is write-protected, mounting read-only
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sr1,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so
> Can Brasero be talked into producing "wrong fs type" ?
> What type of filesystem do you have in mind ?
>
> The posted block, which should contain the ISO 9660 PVD, shows
> pieces of a Joliet tree: ECMA-119 directory records with
> 16-bit characters.
> Joliet exists only in conjunction with ISO 9660. So i
> assume that the records stem from an ISO 9660 image.
Thomas, thanks again for replying to Michael’s message.
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
