2012/10/21 Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li>: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:02:10PM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote: >> I realized the previous 0.28-2.1 proposal had UNRELEASED as suite. >> >> I corrected this and attached the patch based on ensymble 0.28-2 to >> obtain 0.28-2.1. >> >> I would really prefer 0.29-1, but if not, Is this 0.28-2.1 version >> acceptable for a new upload? > > Dear debian-release, > > Eddy Petrișor has provided updates to my (RFA) package ensymble, > fixing an important bug (#629125) relating to python compatibility).
It seems I am responsible for some confusion with bug numbers due to cross posting (and a misleading commit message in git, but the changelog is correct). The python compatibility bug is #616799. > There are two options here: > > - 0.28-3 > this is a minimal patch fixing #629125 > - 0.29-1 > this is a new upstream release which also fixes #629125 (severity: normal) > based on some work I did a while ago but never managed to upload 0.28-3 contains the minimal patch to fix #616799 (the python issue) 0.29-1 fixes both #616799 (the python issue) and the upstream issue #629125 > I have reviewed both sets of changes proposed by Eddy and merged them > into my git repository. > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/dom/ensymble.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.28 > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/dom/ensymble.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master > > I attach diffs for both. Note that the one including 0.29 is long because > upstream has reorganised the directory layout, but the actual changes > are minimal - see <http://code.google.com/p/ensymble/source/list>. > I think both are suitable for wheezy. Sorry for the confusion. -- Regards, EddyP ============================================= The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human ambition. - Carl Sagan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org