On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 the mental interface of Rogério Brito told: > Package: mutt-ng > Version: 0.0+20050916-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi there. > > I saw that muttng is already in the experimental repository of Debian proper > and decided to try it. My first impression on it is that it is a quite good > improvement upon mutt (e.g., the name of the variables are more consistent > etc). > > Unfortunately, some tools (like reportbug, when invoked with -M) call mutt > directly and it would be nice for the system administrators that installed > muttng to be able to choose what to use via the update-alternatives infra > structure provided by Debian.
See Bug#334171 > I would be very grateful if it were possible to use this scheme, so that I > would use muttng in more situations. > > BTW, I do see one minor problem with the naming of muttng: I see the names > mutt-ng and muttng being used without consistency in both the sites, > documentation, command line interface (the name of the executable) etc. The name is mutt-ng, created by ak. libc6 doesn#t accept binaries including a '-'-character in zs name so it is muttng. > It would be nice to have a consistent naming. Not possible Please don't send bugs twice. Elimar -- Do you smell something burning or ist it me?
pgp4Vk95squIb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
