Andreas Henriksson <[email protected]> - Mon, 5 Nov 2012 09:24:55 +0100
>On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 01:17:10PM +0100, Michel Briand (Quand on veut on peut >!) wrote: >[...] >> In the current squeeze version (0.14.3-2) the package works > >You mean wheezy. Squeeze has 0.6.0-1 and 0.14 is very big improvement >over 0.6. Absolutely. >> but lacks a quality improvement that makes it usable. > >While there are several nice improvements in the 0.16 series, >I definitely would not agree that 0.14 is unusable. The sort order of all music album is alphabetical and makes this program definitely "unusable" for playing music. >I've made 0.16 packages available in experimental but I haven't >had much time on working at making them release quality yet. What is "release quality" ? How can I help, what do you need, to make them release quality ? >Also, this is not up to me.... unless you can convince the >release team - this will not happen for wheezy. >You're more then welcome to help out creating backports for wheeezy. >I'm sure there will be alot more stuff that are cool in the 0.18 and >future series as well which wheezy users will want to use.... The very need of backport is that packages are obsolete when stable is released. This is the other side of the coin. I can help to make this not to happen for rygel :). Regards, Michel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
