On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > i just noticed that you were looking to take over vlock [0]. That's > great news! If there's anything i can do to contribute to its > maintenance, i'd be happy to help out. i'm the submitter of bug > 318507 [1], and i'm interested in starting to contribute more > directly to debian than i have so far.
I have skimmed over all the bug reports in the BTS, including your bug. I'm currently not sure if changing vlock is the right approach - or if it is a misfeature in the pam module. For instance, how does the pam module react when used with xlock? Does it lock the smartcard then as well? If not, why not? Peter PS: Thanks for your egate on debian HOWTO -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
