On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote: > That's exactly what I said and why I offered proposed the secondary > more ideal solution, which would be to not close bugs that are > assigned to different packages than the upload itself. Is there a > reason not to do that?
There are some bugs (like wnpp bugs) which are closed by an upload in a different package, for example. It seems reasonable to send out a warning, but I don't want to disallow it. > Point being that it's rather easy to forget ordering relevance, and > it's not very intuitive anyway. Would it be possible to define > something akin to aritmetic operator ordering (i.e. addition follows > multiplication). Each control line operates in isolation; changing that would require a huge redesign of how control works, and would also make it much more brittle. Don Armstrong -- There is no such thing as "social gambling." Either you are there to cut the other bloke's heart out and eat it--or you're a sucker. If you don't like this choice--don't gamble. -- Robert Heinlein _Time Enough For Love_ p250 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
