On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 02:11:09AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
[...]
> > Should we ask debian-legal@ for that?
>
> Elrond thought that it wouldn't be an issue, because UniqueHash.pm is
> just distributed alongside cgiirc (under a different licence).
Even if we assume, that both licenses are incompatible (we
have evidence for that, I think):
I have asked on #d-d, and here are the most relevant
answers I got:
12:35 <Mithrandir> Elrond: not if they aren't linked
together, no.
12:35 <Robot101> Elrond: do they link to each other?
...
12:37 <Md> Elrond: it's widely agreed that the interfaces
of perl modules are abstract enough to not pose
license-compatibility issues
If anyone still feels like contacting debian-legal, they
can, of course.
> Anyways, even if it is not an issue for debian, it would be good to have
> it fixed, so I've filed a bug upstream:
> http://cvs.cgiirc.org/tktview?tn=73,1
Good idea!
Any point in tracking this whole license issue in an
independant debian bug?
Elrond
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
