On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 16:02:38 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (25/12/2012): > > Looks okay to me, but has a udeb; you know the drill :) Assuming > > this gets acked, do we want it urgenting for RC1? > > /me drills a d-i ack. I don't mind having it urgented for RC1, better > spot any regressions now. > Well any regressions wouldn't affect d-i directly, afaict, so I don't think timing wrt rc1 matters much.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
