Am Dienstag, den 25.12.2012, 11:35 -0500 schrieb Paul Tagliamonte:
> Or, see if you can barter with the FTP folks to keep `sun'

Jup, I agree. I think, we should just try to get 'sun' into the
archives. It's still worth the try, than continue discussing... ;-)

If the name gets rejected, we could even choose between:
- suncal
- atsun
- suncalc

> > suncal - seems only to be correct for time/date related calculus.
> > Determination of the sun position in coordinates is not covered. 
> > Depends on if you expand "cal" to "calendar" or "calculation(s)" :)
> > (Maybe suncalc would be clearer for the latter.)
> A agree, suncal isn't bad, but what's neat about sun is how the
command
> invocation flows:
> 
I would prefer 'suncalc'. Just to keep more options open.

Regards,
  Steffen
-- 
Steffen Vogel
Robensstraße 69
52070 Aachen

Mail: p...@steffenvogel.de
Mobil: +49 176 34911387
Web: http://www.steffenvogel.de
Jabber: st...@jabber.ccc.de
ICQ: 236033

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to