retitle 696659 Don't abort upload on missing pre_upload_command or post_upload_command thanks
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 05:55:32PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 08:47:20AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > This all looks great > > > > > > > > Could not execute /usr/share/dput/helper/security-warning: [Errno 2] No > > > such file or directory > > > > We don't own /usr/share/dput -- this looks like it's coming from > > dput-old's /etc/dput.cf -- can you please check if you still have that > > target? > > dput was still in status "removed" since dput was removed when dput-ng > was installed. Aye, they do conflict. > > > Please keep in mind all old dput configs will override new dput configs > > -- we defer to the old configs in all cases :) > > > > If it's still saying to run that hook, dput-ng will try to run the hook. > > > > Perhaps remove that target? > > I will remove /etc/dput.cf, then. I can't remember to have made any special > modifications to the config, so the dput-ng default config should probably > suit me. Hopefully :) If there are additinal targets, I can make sure that it gets added, or help you add a new target. > > By dput-ng should probably handle missing script files more gracefully, I I quite agree -- a missing script should perhaps be non-fatal. > wasn't expecting to need to adapt my config since the package description says > > | dput-ng aims to be backwards compatible with dput in command-line flags, > | configuration files, and expected behavior. Aye. Technically (I hate to make this argument, because dput-ng broke, and above all, that's a problem), it was was just doing what you were telling it, just like dput, there was just a missing script ;) > > Cheers, > Moritz I've retitled the bug to match :) Cheers, and sorry again, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
