On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 02:29:01PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > This breaks existing installations, as it even fails to install. > > > This is on purpose. Jaldhar, I guess the mention of tcp wrapper support
Can you please add a bit of explanation what would be bad about tcpwrapper support? It does not hurt, adds <10k to the package, and in case of dovecot needs to be explicitly enabled in the configuration. Besides, silently breaking existing installation on upgrade without mentioning is a bug, not a wishlist item. Bye, Joerg
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
