Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I didn't take lmodern 0.92-9 into account but only thought about > yesterdays situation. A user who encountered #334658 and did run
[...] > --edit. That's what I meant with 'back at square one'. OK, thanks for explaining. > Now, with the new lmodern in unstable, this can't happen anymore, but > your second case is still problematic. Maybe the best place to check for > additional updmap.cfg files would be update-updmap. And since one could > go around in circles with simply removing additional updmap.cfg files, > one might have to inform the user about this, present a diff or > something like this ... I fully agree. I may implement that in update-updmap as you suggest, if I don't feel too dizzy (pretty bad night, ugh...). -- Florent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
