Hi,
I request more info about this problem [1], because I was not sure what
is the right option:
1. update-initramfs -u
2. update-initramfs -u -k all
In the debian/changelog file there are these lines:
-------8<------
uswsusp (0.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream. For the impatient: this closes: #441310.
(...)
* Call update-initramfs without `-k all'
(...)
-- Tim Dijkstra <t...@famdijkstra.org> Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:18:46 +0200
-------8<------
And in the debian/NEWS file:
-------8<------
uswsusp (0.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
NOTE, by default update-initramfs -u only updates the initramfs of the
latest kernel. This can lead to incompatibilities between s2disk and
resume if you boot an older kernel.
To circumvent this problem uswsusp used to call u-i with `-k all' to
update the initramfs of all kernel versions. This was deemed `impolite',
because it can also mean that you break all initramfs instead of just
the last. The current u-i can be made to update all initramfses by setting
update_initramfs=all in /etc/initramfs-tools/update-initramfs.conf.
-- Tim Dijkstra <t...@famdijkstra.org> Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:13:17 +0200
-------8<------
After the question in debian-devel, they point me that the current option,
without "-k all" is better, and is possible to update all installed kernels
using the info in debian/NEWS.
Therefore, I will close this bug. Thanks a lot for your report.
kix
1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/01/msg00446.html
--
||// //\\// Rodolfo "kix" Garcia
||\\// //\\ http://www.kix.es/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
