Dear maintainers,
I have to admit that till yesterday I have no idea about qscintilla was. I
need it to compile a software (v-rep) and I have found the problems of
scintilla.
I agree witn Martin von Loewis [1] in the analisys. One hour before I reported
a bug to scite [2]. I didn't realized that the problem is more complex.
I don't know where have to go SciLexer stuff. It's a part of code share
between different packages. But, IMHO it should be provided for debian because
if not, for example I'm not be able to compile a package that claims that
_only_ needs qscintilla. If I complain to upstream, the answer is obvious:
qscintilla upstream provides that part of code.
An "easy" patch is to modify qscintilla.pro and the libqscintilla2-dev.install
to include that files:
------------------------------------------------
--- qscintilla2-2.6.2.orig/Qt4Qt5/qscintilla.pro
+++ qscintilla2-2.6.2/Qt4Qt5/qscintilla.pro
@@ -66,7 +66,10 @@ isEmpty(qsci.path) {
qsci.path = $(QTDIR)
}
-INSTALLS += header trans qsci target
+scintilla.path = /usr/include
+scintilla.files = ../include/*.h
+
+INSTALLS += header trans qsci target scintilla
HEADERS = \
./Qsci/qsciglobal.h \
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
--- libqscintilla2-dev.install.orig 2013-01-22 13:56:35.436559995 +0100
+++ libqscintilla2-dev.install 2013-01-22 13:57:59.485873619 +0100
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-usr/include/qt4/Qsci/*.h
+usr/include
usr/lib/*.so
------------------------------------------------
So, please could you do considering this "before" wheezy release? (if it's
possible). In my case, this is a critical bug because libqscintilla is
unusable.
Best regards,
Leopold
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203177#15
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698680
--
--
Linux User 152692
Catalonia
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
