On 01/31/2013 02:49 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:27:56PM +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
On 01/31/2013 02:11 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
lvm2 is blocked by d-i right now. As I had to cheat already to not use
t-p-u, I don't consider this viable for Wheezy.
Wouldn't it be possible to upload a new version to unstable, then
after that upload 2.02.95-4.1 to t-p-u with just this patch?
No. This can only be introduced via unstable according to the effective
rules. And I already told you, I won't accept it.
It's that if someone is using lvm2 on an Intel Matrix Raid array via
mdadm, which is a working and supported configuration on wheezy, and
for some reason one of the disks is kicked out of the array, LVM2
/will/ detect lvm vg's and lv's on that disk/pv - creating chaos and
very possibly data loss.
And?
Dataloss is cause for a bug with severity "critical".
Mike.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
