On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 08:37:44 Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > Millions of warnings per file are hardly useful. > > Besides GNU tar restore archive to btrfs without any warnings.
Sorry there was a typo here... I meant to write "millions of warnings per archive file" (my archive have over million folders). > > You can use the gnu tar format in libarchive as well. (See the > bug report I mentioned in previous mail). > That way you'll not store any additional metadata, so you won't > get any warnings about not being able to restore it on extraction. Thank you for this advice, I'll try "--format=gnutar". > I don't really see how to handle this "bug" in debian. I agree that there > are places where libarchive can be enhanced. I recommend you file > enhancement requests in the upstream bug tracker, if you think that you > have something which isn't already covered by the bug (mentioned in > previous mail) that was forwarded upstream. Thank you for your help. This was a first place to seek assistance. Perhaps my case is worth mentioning upstream as another example... In any way please feel free to handle this bug as you wish. Best wishes, Dmitry Smirnov GPG key : 4096R/53968D1B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
