Le 02/07/13 13:15, Michael Stapelberg a écrit :
> Hi Adam,
>
> "Adam D. Barratt" <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> writes:
>> Looking at the proposed tpu diff and the 3.0 -> 3.1 diff, it looks like
>> the armhf changes should apply "as is" to 3.1; has anyone tried that?
> I have ported the patches from 3.0 to 3.1 and successfully built the
> package on amd64, where it works.
>
> Therefore, I will now build it on armhf, which will take around a day.
>
> Sylvestre: Are you okay with me NMUing clang 3.1-8.1 to unstable in
> order to expose my changes to a wider audience before we do the fix via
> t-p-u?
>
Please go ahread. :)

Thanks again,
Sylvestre


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to