Control: block -1 by 689508 689202 On 2013-02-22 05:19, Dave Steele wrote: > While looking at the piatti piuparts report Andreas pointed to today, > I noticed that failures are racking up for debsums modifications.
> http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/binutils-multiarch_2.22-7.1.log > > /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj/usr/bin/strings > /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj/usr/bin/gprof these are diverted debsums (2.0.49) unstable; urgency=low * when querying dpkg-divert include the user specified root filesystem in --admindir (Closes: #632463) piatti is running 2.0.48+nmu3 > I believe that debsums should not report failures for modified files > which are owned by multiple packages, or are subject to diversion. Why not? I'm running a locally modified debsums from wheezy here with two patches applied: * correct symlink lookup (debsums --root escapes the chroot and looks up files in the host system which may have different content ... #689202) * ignore obsolete conffiles (#689508, local HACK) and that solved the debsums issues for me For #689202 I could do a NMU, but unfortunately for #689508 I cant offer a nice clean solution. Then we could get debsums unblocked, into wheezy and backport it and finally install it on piatti. Or we could add a modified copy of debsums to piuparts, only to be used when running from git as on piatti ... Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org