Package: python-defaults Severity: normal -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Dear Maintainer, DPP section 2.2 describes the policy for naming binary packages of Python packages, e.g. python-* and python3-*. For packages with submodules in namespaces, e.g. zope.interface, the implied policy is to name it python-foo.bar and python3-foo.bar. However, I've had some feedback from people that this should be explicitly stated, thus this bug Something like the following could be added to python-policy.sgml: "For subpackages such as <var>foo.bar</var>, the recommendation is to name the binary packages <package>python-<var>foo.bar</var></package> and <package>python3-<var>foo.bar</var></package>. " - -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRJ4zoAAoJEBJutWOnSwa/ZD0QAL+iiNdA00zo44+XUcGQWkoL vnJVq7biptf3mgtj+mhkVLmdhzK2ZbI4sieo1CstaB4+Sj6wgwoYlEWoNPYgKJAL HO5jKA4O/ZZQbhgxLWVyMS5K0Ie5DA/9YJi7euSg6OJgzhGravPX4zaIXIV+LyS9 WXShj3Bz1qE8pKKZvnJeAnsbdqwL3jY5WTs4jdImrB+Ps156rFCV2CZ1/96jplCs zOMGfHlzigaaVWwn3p8vNzusxijcUbXXm+nqpqOokNVzEQVgiBiunR4x64oEM9dD V0aG/POq9rHmG+2hp2WPllKdDJtUVQNUwvgyfxygjYmDHBp7zvVA+h4clPNJN9UQ Hvaozb75PkLYTbJFv262/I+KnKmzAqBvAtN8Yf7zor8Xdx79AeNSX44jelf5LBSA myNu+0WSdDvwNvKosZxHpfXV9vYZXBO1PS9I0RUbPWcy8ff5RQToxlVv2R3dj+R9 z6lsEw2qLoKyradnIR+xnRhB5YxOyGMtYi0YqOoteQl9+ilzJiI2Q+qe9Ie6OHUl 5svs+m6bnKp3VKeiuhzHMB2jowrFWhNqt9tmP2wlnhtJ674e7eBIv+LObnQOrrHi fwkVmbWg7ZCzuUTios7SO+bJ8Wfc6MrKnYtrDVUB4QciAe/K0J4SfM6LsRyX+/MF HICbuTirpifxWUUDQIK6 =0LBA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
