tag 701169 wontfix
severity 701169 minor
thanks

On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Philipp Kern wrote:
> intel-microcode's initramfs hook seems to try to load microcode
> unconditionally. This causes the following error messages to appear if no

Yes.

> microcode is present in the package, once for every scheduling unit:
> 
> [    4.257698] platform microcode: firmware: agent aborted loading 
> intel-ucode/06-2c-02 (not found?)

Those messages will still show up when you load the microcode module anyway
(and it will be autoloaded, so if you want to avoid the messages at all you
actually have to blacklist it), and they're caused by the firmware kernel
subsystem which has no concept of a "silently try to load a binary blob and
keep quiet about it if it is not found" AFAIK.

> It would be good if the script could deduce the ID and not only check if the
> directory is present, but also if the corresponding microcode update itself is
> available.

I am not adding complexity of that level to the early boot if it can be
avoided: IMO, it is not worth the risk _and_ it would force the update
engine to actually understand the microcode layout of the underlying
processor, which is not a forward-compatible change and therefore it could
cause issues in the future.

I recommend that you just ignore the messages, that way you will still get
an updated microcode if Intel decides to start shipping one for your
processor.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to