On 2013-02-23 16:58, Osamu Aoki wrote: > I think if I update this, I need to add new hush number for new > im-switch to ensure automatic erase.
Why not drop the md5sum check as regards 80im-switch and use the attached file as is instead? As Iain Lane pointed out at the Ubuntu bug report, if im-config deletes the file, and the user at a later point of time decides to go back to im-switch (for some reason), 80im-switch won't be reinstalled, and the user is faced with an issue that may be hard to track down. Now when that line has been added to 80im-switch in the normal way, you can say that with the file I propose, all debian/postinst would do is adding a line to 80im-switch that would otherwise have been added at next update. It does no harm in any way. If the policy still makes you hesitate, you should bear in mind that it was scarcely written with this special case in mind. Somebody should be able to approve an exception. Using the attached file would also eliminate one of the current differences between the Debian and Ubuntu versions of im-config. Hopefully we'll soon be able to use exactly the same version. -- Gunnar Hjalmarsson https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
