Hi Sebastian, On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 03:41:40AM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote [edited]: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 05:08:29PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > > Some debian.net services would serve their purpose better if they were > > integrated into the www.d.o namespace, but the criteria for deciding which > > services would qualify is not documented. > > I don't think that it makes sense to write down any such list of > criteria. Imho, this needs to be a case-by-case decision and the exact > criteria greatly depend on what kind of service is offered. E.g., in the [..]
I agree that there can't be an exhaustive and general-enough list of such criteria. Having said that, it would be useful to set some broad expectations on what it takes for a d.n service to graduate to an official one. Even some generic guidelines would have the benefit of informing developers at the beginning of a developing a service (eg. likelihood of support of certain technical choices), and could later on be the starting point of a discussion of promoting that service to an official one. cheers, sez -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
