On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 03:46 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 08:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> > > wrote: > [...]
> > > In future all ARM kernels should be multi-platform, but I expect there > > > will still be different flavours, such as for LPAE or the RT featureset. > > > I would much prefer a name that will provide a more useful distinction > > > in future (and not be too long!). Perhaps it should refer to the CPU > > > requirement like the flavours for some other architectures. > > > > I see. Although it is very simple, how is "armmp"? > [...] > > Sounds alright to be, but let's allow the other ARM porters a few more > days to comment. 'MP' has some history as meaning multi-processor, so might be confusing. (But perhaps not confusing to many.) -- Tixy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
