On Apr 15, Jonathan Wiltshire <j...@debian.org> wrote: > > * etc-services: removed console (782/tcp). > > Reverted because #658077 was totally bogus: this entry is not useful. > Possibly, if this actually causes a problem. Is it harmless to leave it in > place? It is harmful if appears in a release and somebody uses it, because then it will be much harder to remove.
> > * etc-services: added urd (465/tcp). ssmtp and smtps kept as aliases. > > (Closes: #703175) > "Only" severity normal... > > * etc-services: added db-lsp (17500/tcp). (Closes: #695708) > ... wishlist ... > > * etc-protocols: added hopopt (0). (Closes: #675339) > ... wishlist ... Yes, but they are all trivial changes. > > * Removed ip6-localnet and ip6-mcastprefix from the default /etc/hosts > > created by postinst because they have no purpose. (Closes: #688090) > ... and normal. This has barely any effect since the code is triggered only if /etc/hosts does not exists (and usually it always exist, since d-i creates it and changed it this way long ago). > If those severities aren't accurate please tell the bts. Otherwise, no they > are no longer changes we consider urgent. They are all old bugs and could > have been cleared up in plenty of time before now. OK, I suck as a maintainer and as a human being and I neglected my packages for most of the last year. But I'd rather move on and fix what can still be fixed. > > * Made the package Multi-Arch foreign. (Closes: #688396) > Definitely not. Why? netbase is just four config files nowadays, it's not like declaring it foreign could break anything. > > * Slightly raised the ifupdown Breaks version to match Ubuntu. > Is there are technical reason for this or just a courtesy to our > derivatives? No technical reason, the delta is a few releases which only existed in unstable for a short time (and nobody is supposed to be using anymore due to them being quite "experimental"). -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
