Am 10.02.2010 15:44, schrieb Ludovic Brenta: > > retitle 568452 polyorb: please add support for armel > severity 568452 wishlist > thanks > > Given the architecture-specific problems we've had with gnat > and polyorb, adding support for a new architecture is not to > be taken too lightly. > > Given the time it takes to compile polyorb on slow architectures > (e.g. 6 hours 51 minutes on hppa), an important aspect to this > is the availablility of armel buildd machines. Are you prepared > to build polyorb manually on your own armel machine? > > (also, do you really want to develop distributed applications > in Ada on armel?) > > Two small, leaf packages that build-depend only on gnat-4.4 > recently and tentatively switched to Architecture: any. The > results for armel are not encouraging: > > libxmlezout: FTBFS: Not-For-Us (is armel in "any" on that buildd?) > liblog4ada: FTBFS: BD-Uninstallable (is gnat-4.4 on that buildd?) > > I suggest we wait until we have reassurances that the buildds > are really available, with gnat-4.4, before we attempt to add > support for armel in more complex Ada packages.
how did this picture change with armel and armhf? I see more issues with mips and mipsel these days. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
