On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:18:32 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Recommends: libasync-interrupt-perl | libasync-interrupt-perl, > > > libev-perl, libguard-perl > > > > Hm? > > Did you mean > > Recommends: libasync-interrupt-perl | libev-perl, > > libasync-interrupt-perl | libguard-perl > > ? > > Yes, that's exactly what I meant. Thanks for reading my mind :-D
:) > > Alternatively we could also just add all three to Recommends without > > alternatives. > > Only when EV is _not_ available and used is there a benefit of having > Async::Interrupt available. > > ...but then again, that means for the cases of explicitly using a > different backend it is beneficial to have Async::Interrupt available. > > So yes, I think it is best to plain recommend each of them - even if > Async::Interrupt won't actually be _used_ "in most cases". Ok, makes sense. Applied in git. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Johnny Cash: Give My Love To Rose
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
