On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 09:41 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2013-01-08 01:14, Mike Gabriel wrote: > > I am happy to follow any of your suggestions, esp. because I would call > > my self a still-learning-Perl-person. The big question is, if a change > > like you propose might make a difference for the transition of an > > adapted-like-you-suggest package to wheezy. If there is a yes to that > > question, I will put fixing the package on prio-A. > > > Personally, I would flat out reject the changes as long as they ignore > errors[1]. So that sense, I suppose it will make a difference. > Mind you, even with the proper error handling I am not sure I would > unblock the package. Partly because I am not confident with particular > things the script is doing and partly because of Julien's comment on the > changes being invasive.
There doesn't seem to have been a further upload, and the changes are definitely too invasive this close to the release, so I'm afraid we're going to have to decline this request at this point. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
