On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:48:44 -0400 Joey Hess <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Do you know of any conventional XMPP client (I mean something other > > than git-annex) which supports SCRAM-SHA-1 so that I could test > > that the patch did not break things for other clients? > > > > I'm asking because > > 1) I asked a fellow Process One developer what he thinks about the > > patch, and he told me he was about to review it, but I still did > > not hear from him about this matter. > > 2) The software I'm routinely using (Tkabber, Miranda and Net::XMPP > > Perl module) do not use SCRAM so I have no idea how to make sure > > myself this patch does not break anything. > > > > Hence to advance on this issue I need some assistance. > > A quick search turned up: [...] Thanks! My fellow P1 developer confirmed the patch works OK. Unfortunately, it does not apply on 2.1.10, and it's not possible to just massage it -- the SCRAM code seems to be changed heavily after the 2.1.10 was released. Stephen, could you please help us and look at modifying your patch so that it applies on 2.1.10? My own Erlang skills are not up to this task. I'm referring to this Debian bug report [1]. And the release time is unfortunately very close. 1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705613 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
