Control: tag -1 + pending

On Wed, 08 May 2013 13:10:12 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:

> > It's possible to have the "old" libjgoodies-forms-java installed
> > (e.g. on a wheezy system) and then to install the "new" patched
> > mediathekview, which will most probably break.
> > 
> > So I think a versioned dependency on libjgoodies-forms-java >= 1.6
> > would indeed make sense for mediathekview.
> 
> 
> Well, that's true. I didn't think thoroughly enough about the "mixed
> distributions" case here because this is not a problem if you use pure
> sid or pure testing whereby version 1.6.0-3 of libjgoodies-forms-java
> enters before mediathekview. 

Ack.

> Indeed a versioned dependency on
> libjgoodies-forms-java makes sense in this case.

Ok, I'm glad we reach the same conclusions :)
 
> I'd be glad if you could lend me a helping hand with MV again. I have
> prepared a new revision that contains only the versioned dependency change.
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mediathekview/mediathekview_3.2.1+git20130327-2.dsc

Sure, I'll upload in a few hours when I'm back home.

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   BOFH excuse #97:  Small animal kamikaze attack on power supplies 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to