Hi Jonas,

Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]> writes:
> I find it wrong (and from a privacy perspective unacceptable) to have a 
> monitoring daemon by default also be a beacon towards the outside
> World. 
I don’t understand what you mean by that. Could you be more explicit
please? In which way is kanla a beacon?

> Since there is a simple alternative of providing _no_ credentials 
> instead of _bogus_ credentials, I propose to do that.
The default credentials have the user [email protected]. The domain
example.com was reserved by IANA in RFC 2606, see also
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example.com — it will never actually point
to some working jabber server. The credentials are just an example, and
will never make kanla actually connect to anywhere.

-- 
Best regards,
Michael


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to