Daniel Hartwig <[email protected]> writes: > Reuben Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: >> guile-2.0-doc Suggests guile-2.0-doc-dfsg, which doesn't exist. Either >> produce the package or remove the suggestion?
> Right. There are no longer invariant sections in the docs, and no > dfsg/non-dfsg split. Ahh, good point -- I'll check that before I upload 2.0.9 (waiting on automake1.12 to migrate to unstable). > The "+1" in the version is not required anymore either. Hmm, may still need it since I always repackage the upstream source (I'm building directly from an upstream derived git branch). Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
