On 2013-05-25 20:24, Wojtek Kaniewski wrote:
| > 
| >    http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610979
|
| I took the patch sent by Roland Stigge and checked it into the
| repository. Then I added an option -H that ignores IPv4/IPv6 hints
| if the initial attempt does not succeed, so it basically allows
| IPv4-IPv4 and IPv6-IPv6 tunnels.
|
| Is this what you wanted? If not, please point me to some specific
| e-mail from the bug tracker discussion, since I could have missed
| it.

  *) Roland's patch was attempt the bug

  *) But, then ... read from this forward:
     See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610979#57

  *) It might have been and an user error. See
     http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610979#80

     ... based on Roland's comment later
     http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610979#92

  *) But even after that, things are fuzzy
     http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610979#97

I'm not very familiar the bug in general; I'm late for adopting the
package.

I trust your judgement what to do with this.

If you think you have the solution in latest code, I'm fine and ready
to close the bug. Perhaps the manual page made somewhat more explicit?
So that it's clear to everybody what tunnelings are possible and what;
and to address the concern in message #97.

| The changes can be seen in repository trunk.

I have missed your repository. Could you point me to it.

| If it's okay with you, I can put a tarball with a new version and
| get over with the 8-year-old release candidate version.

That would ve very much appreciated.

| And if you have some other patches in Debian, I could add them as
| well.

I'm attaching the current set of patches based on 0.11rc2. I hope some
may be useful for your new release. Let me know which ones you picked.

Thanks,
Jari

Attachment: patches.tar.gz
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to