* Daniel Schepler <dschep...@gmail.com> [2013-05-27 18:49 -0700]: [...] > OK, so binutils has been upgraded past 2.23.2-2 in experimental in > the meantime.
Hmm, 52 is greater than 2, isn't it? > But testing with binutils 2.23.52.20130522-1, I can reproduce the > same error. > > And according to Matthias Klose, this is an > intentional behavior change in binutils upstream, Frim binutils NEWS file: Changes in 2.23: * Add support for the VLE extension to the PowerPC architecture. * Add support for x64 Windows target of the delayed-load-library. * Add support for the Renesas RL78 architecture. Changes in 2.22: .... Those changes are not that important. So maybe you have to double check your build environment. > and it will eventually be uploaded to unstable once gcc-4.7 > and gcc-4.8 updates have filtered through into testing. Which is why I > upgraded to this binutils for build testing (along with gcc-defaults -> > gcc-4.8, make 3.82-1 from experimental, texinfo 5.1 from unstable which is > stricter about error checking than past versions, etc.). Let's wait and see...... Elimar -- We all know Linux is great... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds. -Linus Torvalds -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org