Hi, On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 03:00:30PM +0800, Liang Guo wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Michael Biebl <[email protected]> wrote: > > BTW, is it necessary to create an libvala-dev package, just like valac for > valac-<version number>?
We are building the vala packages with --disable-unversioned, this means that not only valac, but also the .pc files are versioned, e.g. /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/libvala-0.20.pc While we do manage a /usr/bin/valac symlink via alternative, we do not offer the same for libvala, that's why there is no unversioned libvala-dev package. We only have very few packages requiring libvala, so it didn't seem necessary and worth the effort, to provide such an unversioned libvala-dev package. Regards, Michael P.S: You need to CC me on replies, otherwise I/the bug submitter won't get an email. I only noticed your reply by checking [1] [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709694 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
